<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stormwater Partners Network</title>
	<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Montgomery County Candidate&#8217;s Survey Responses on Environmental Issues ; Sept. 7 Forum‏</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=183</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Cameron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Public Officials and Candidates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stormwater Partners,
Conservation Montgomery has published the candidates&#8217;       responses to a survey of their views on environmental issues in Montgomery     County, including:  the Forest Conservation Law; street trees; and WSSC&#8217;s     budget. 15 candidates responded.
Please note that this Tuesday, Sept. 7, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stormwater Partners,</p>
<p>Conservation Montgomery has published the <a href="http://conservationmontgomery.org/candidates.html" target="_blank">candidates&#8217;       responses</a> to a survey of their views on environmental issues in Montgomery     County, including:  the Forest Conservation Law; street trees; and WSSC&#8217;s     budget. 15 candidates responded.</p>
<p>Please note that this Tuesday, Sept. 7, there will be a forum for     the at-large candidates at 7 pm, at Brookside Gardens.</p>
<p><u>At-Large Council Candidates&#8217; Forum</u><br />
<strong><strong><strong><strong><strong>Tuesday, Sept. 7, from 7:00 to 9:00 PM at Brookside               Gardens, 1800 Glenallan Ave., Wheaton</strong>           </strong></strong></strong></strong>County Council Candidates Forum -       All At-Large County Council Candidates Invited. This will be a       Town Hall-type meeting, with questions being asked from the floor,       after opening statements from each of the candidates.       Sponsored by: Wheaton Regional Park Neighborhood Association;       Greater Glenmont Civic Association; Aspen Hill Civic Association,       Inc.; Glenmont Forest neighbors Civic Association; Wheaton       Citizens Coalition; Kemp Mill Civic Association; Conn. Ave Estates       Civic Association; and the Citizens League of Montgomery County.       Moderated by the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County<strong><strong><strong><strong><br />
</strong></strong></strong></strong></p>
<p>- Diane<strong><strong><strong><strong><br />
</strong></strong></strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=183</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watershed Assistance Green Streets Grant Program Now Open</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=182</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chesapeake Bay]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Streets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a posting from the Chesapeake Bay Trust site:
Deadline: September 25, 2010
The Chesapeake Bay Trust and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, the Maryland Department of the Environment are partnering with the United States Environmental Protection Agency for a special funding opportunity for green streets and other urban green infrastructure projects.  This partnership is soliciting proposals for urban green [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a posting from the Chesapeake Bay Trust site:</p>
<p><strong>Deadline: September 25, 2010</strong></p>
<p>The Chesapeake Bay Trust and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, the Maryland Department of the Environment are partnering with the United States Environmental Protection Agency for a special funding opportunity for green streets and other urban green infrastructure projects.  This partnership is soliciting proposals for urban green infrastructure-driven technical planning and design assistance associated with watershed restoration projects.  The highest quality projects will be part of an overall integrated community or watershed plan with the aims to improve local and Bay water quality in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays whilecreating green jobs in urban areas. </p>
<p>Local governments and non-profit organizations in urbanized watersheds located in the Chesapeake Bay region of Maryland and the Anacostia Watershed within Washington, D.C. are invited to submit requests for consideration. Those interested in projects within the Atlantic Coastal Bays watershed should consider the regular Watershed Assistance Grant Program RFP issued separately</p>
<p>For the full Request for Proposals and detail for this special opportunity, please <a href="http://www.cbtrust.org/atf/cf/%7BEB2A714E-8219-45E8-8C3D-50EBE1847CB8%7D/08.10.10%20-%20FY11%20-%20Watershed%20Asst%20Grant%20Program-%20RFP%20-%20Special%20-%20Green%20Streets.pdf"><strong><font color="#0067a4">click here</font></strong></a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=182</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gazette: Stormwater group urges increase in fines</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=181</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s Montgomery Gazette has an article on the work of Stormwater Partners Steve Dryden and Diane Cameron to double the fine for sediment control violations in Montgomery County.  The current $500 fine doesn&#8217;t seem to be enough incentive for some businesses to prevent sediment from running off construction sites and into Montgomery County streams. 
The article quotes Steve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s Montgomery Gazette has an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gazette.net/stories/08182010/silvnew204433_32546.php">article</a> on the work of Stormwater Partners Steve Dryden and Diane Cameron to double the fine for sediment control violations in Montgomery County.  The current $500 fine doesn&#8217;t seem to be enough incentive for some businesses to prevent sediment from running off construction sites and into Montgomery County streams. </p>
<p>The article quotes Steve Dryden: <em>&#8220;I hope it will send more of a message. Obviously some big companies don&#8217;t care. They just factor it into the cost of business.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><img width="350" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905252.JPG" height="262" style="width: 350px; height: 262px" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=181</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montgomery County Radically Rezoned</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=180</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=180#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Site Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Actually, this is an entry for the Build a Better Burb contest in New York to envision a retrofitting of suburban Long Island, Long Island Radically Rezoned.  In the conception of architect Tobias Holler and his team, 50% of the land is designated as open space, 8% as high density agriculture, 35.4% as suburban fabric, and 6.6% as downtown areas.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/lirr.jpg"><img width="720" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/lirr.jpg" height="540" /></a></p>
<p>Actually, this is an entry for the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.buildabetterburb.org">Build a Better Burb</a> contest in New York to envision a retrofitting of suburban Long Island, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/LIRR-Long-Island-Radically-Rezoned/112352002146513?ref=sgm"><em>Long Island Radically Rezoned</em></a>.  In the conception of architect Tobias Holler and his team, 50% of the land is designated as open space, 8% as high density agriculture, 35.4% as suburban fabric, and 6.6% as downtown areas.  The forested areas have a high degree of connectivity.</p>
<p><object width="400" height="225">
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=13052474&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=13052474&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/13052474">LIRR Long Island Radically Rezoned</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user3622535">LIRR</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=180</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Case Study: Sediment Control Problem at Leesborough Construction Site, Wheaton</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=178</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Michels</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Sligo Creek]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a case study of poor erosion and sediment control in Montgomery County.  The site is Leesborough (Centex construction), the former Good Counsel site (bordered by Georgia Ave., Amherst Ave., Arcola Ave. and Elkin St.) in Wheaton, Maryland.  The result was sediment laden runoff from the construction site.  The photos below are from May 25, 2009 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">Here is a case study of poor erosion and sediment control in Montgomery County.  The site is Leesborough (Centex construction), the former Good Counsel site (bordered by Georgia Ave., Amherst Ave., Arcola Ave. and Elkin St.) in Wheaton, Maryland.  The result was sediment laden runoff from the construction site.  The photos below are from May 25, 2009 (after many similar overflows for months).</p>
<p align="center"><img align="textTop" width="350" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905251.JPG" height="263" style="width: 350px; height: 263px" /></p>
<p align="center"> <em>Uncontrolled erosion on-site above basin</em></p>
<p align="center"><img align="textTop" width="350" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905252.JPG" height="262" style="width: 350px; height: 262px" /></p>
<p align="center"><em>Flow from containment basin, across sidewalk,<br />
into Amherst Ave</em></p>
<p align="center"><em><img width="350" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905254.JPG" height="468" style="width: 350px; height: 468px" /></em></p>
<p align="center"><img align="textTop" width="350" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905253.JPG" height="468" style="width: 350px; height: 468px" /></p>
<p align="center" class="PhotoCaption"><em>Flow into street leading to storm drain at Amherst and Elkin</em></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905255.JPG" /></p>
<p align="center"><em>The headwaters of Sligo Creek at Channing and Blueridge Ave. &#8212; the sediment laden runoff from the Leesborough/Centex site merging with the clear runoff from neighborhood streets.<br />
</em></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/Leesborough200905256.JPG" /></p>
<p align="center"><em>Sligo Creek about half a mile down stream showing the sediment laden flow from the construction site.</em></p>
<p align="left">A full report about the incident can be found here on the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fosc.org/AL-Channing201001.htm">Friends of Sligo Creek web site</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=178</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Stormwater ESD Code Unanimously Approved by the Council‏</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=177</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=177#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Cameron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Site Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater Management Act of 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stormwater Partners,
The Montgomery County Council unanimously passed Expedited Bill 40-10 around noon today!  As you know, this is the bill that amends our stormwater code to require that Environmental Site Design become the new norm in how projects are designed and built.
In this revised ordinance, Montgomery County kept its strong stormwater volume standards - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stormwater Partners,</p>
<p>The Montgomery County Council unanimously passed <a target="_blank" href="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/council/pdf/bill/2010/20100727_40-10.pdf">Expedited Bill 40-10</a> around noon today!  As you know, this is the bill that amends our stormwater code to require that Environmental Site Design become the new norm in how projects are designed and built.</p>
<p>In this revised ordinance, Montgomery County kept its strong stormwater volume standards - requiring redevelopment as well as new development projects to address both the first one inch of each storm as well as the &#8220;Channel Protection Volume&#8221; (equivalent to the largest storm that typically occurs once per year, 2.6&#8243; of rain in 24 hours). </p>
<p>Through a concerted team effort that included &#8220;sweating the details&#8221; through legislative and administrative lobbying (beginning in Montgomery County more than a year ago on this ordinance), along with end-stage negotiations, we were able to win agreement from all stakeholders to eliminate the two worst waiver provisions that were in an earlier draft of the bill (in one case through deletion, in the other, through a revision).</p>
<p>Many thanks to:  Ginny Barnes, Brent Bolin, Bruce Gilmore, and Dana Minerva who each brought in persuasive powers, policy wisdom, and effective communications exactly when they were needed.  In addition, Anacostia Riverkeeper Dottie Yunger made phone calls and sent emails in support of the changes we needed to the bill, Steve Dryden testified, attended Council sessions and the negotiation, and Anne Ambler gave excellent testimony on July 13.  Many other Stormwater Partners stayed up on the issues and wrote their own letters of support.</p>
<p>DEP Director Hoyt and DPS Water Manager Rick Brush were also helpful throughout this process, as were the members of the Council&#8217;s T&amp;E  Committee.  They deserve our thanks, and I will be thanking them directly.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=177#more-177" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=177</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighbors of the Northwest Branch Testimony to the County</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=176</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=176#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Ambler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Branch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Site Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater Management Act of 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am speaking on behalf of Neighbors of the Northwest Branch, a citizen-based nonprofit dedicated to the restoration of the Northwest Branch of the Anacostia River. We experience first hand the results of current “best management practices” for stormwater: deeply eroded stream channels, exposed and vulnerable sewer pipes, and pollution and nutrients from streets and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am <a target="_blank" href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/PDF/NNWB20100713.pdf">speaking</a> on behalf of <a href="http://www.neighborsnwb.org/">Neighbors of the Northwest Branch</a>, a citizen-based nonprofit dedicated to the restoration of the Northwest Branch of the Anacostia River. We experience first hand the results of current “best management practices” for stormwater: deeply eroded stream channels, exposed and vulnerable sewer pipes, and pollution and nutrients from streets and yards carried down the Northwest Branch to the Anacostia River to be deposited in a dying Bay. </p>
<p>The Stormwater Management Act of 2007 opened a new chapter, setting Environmental Site Design (ESD) as the new <em>standard for development</em>. Bill 40-10 begins the process of writing the new standards into existing county code. Kudos to the County Exec for continuing to apply thesame stormwater volume standards to both new development and redevelopment projects. But some other parts of the code revision must be strengthened—now, before approval. </p>
<p> <a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=176#more-176" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=176</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stormwater Partners Letter to the County Council</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=175</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Cameron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Stormwater Management Act of 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Dear Council President Floreen,
The Montgomery County Stormwater Partners consist of 22 organizations working together for the protection and restoration of Montgomery&#8217;s streams, rivers, and lakes. We appreciate this opportunity to convey our comments on Expedited Bill 40-10, containing proposed changes to our County&#8217;s stormwater regulations (Chapter 19 of the County Code). We trust that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman"></p>
<p align="left"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/PDF/SWPLetter20100711.pdf">Dear Council President Floreen</a>,</p>
<p align="left">The Montgomery County Stormwater Partners consist of 22 organizations working together for the protection and restoration of Montgomery&#8217;s streams, rivers, and lakes. We appreciate this opportunity to convey our comments on Expedited Bill 40-10, containing proposed changes to our County&#8217;s stormwater regulations (Chapter 19 of the County Code). We trust that the Council will seriously consider the public’s input on this Bill and conduct a full and deliberative process at this juncture.</p>
<p align="left">We support several key aspects of the proposed stormwater code changes, including the continuance of Montgomery&#8217;s longstanding tradition of applying the same stormwater volume standards for on-site management to both new development and redevelopment projects.</p>
<p align="left">Other aspects of Bill 40-10 are counter to the Stormwater Management Act and/or existing County policy; the Council must remedy these problems before approving the ordinance:</p>
<p align="left">1) The bill&#8217;s grandfathering provisions are much too broad and lenient. The revised stormwater ordinance should require that all County-owned project proposals, and all private projects with substantial county subsidies, that went into facility planning in or after Fiscal Year 2009, comply with the new Environmental Site Design (ESD) requirements. This is consistent with the 2007 Clean Water Task Force recommendations.</p>
<p align="left">2) The proposed waiver eligibilities would make it easier for projects to be waived from on-site stormwater capture and treatment requirements for infill, redevelopment and phased projects, and projects with unspecified special circumstances; we ask that these be removed. Such broad categorical waiver eligibility is counter to existing County policy and practice, and to the Stormwater Management Act.</p>
<p align="left">3) Remove the loophole that allows projects discharging to regional stormwater facilities to be eligible for waivers.</p>
<p align="left"> <a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=175#more-175" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=175</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing Conservation Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=174</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=174#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Cameron</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Watershed Organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 	 	 	 	
What is Conservation Montgomery?  Conservation Montgomery is a new umbrella non-profit non-governmental coalition in Montgomery County, Maryland set up to represent a broad spectrum of resident interests on environmental and civic challenges facing the county. It is being established as a 501(c) 3 coalition funded by donations from member  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	<title></title> 	 	 	<!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 		A:link { so-language: zxx } 	--></p>
<p><strong>What is Conservation Montgomery? </strong><a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/PDF/ConservationMontgomery20100708.pdf" target="_blank"> Conservation Montgomery</a> is a new umbrella non-profit non-governmental coalition in Montgomery County, Maryland set up to represent a broad spectrum of resident interests on environmental and civic challenges facing the county. It is being established as a 501(c) 3 coalition funded by donations from member  organizations and individuals within and adjacent to Montgomery County. Conservation Montgomery is a forum for residents of the county to analyze positions and records of elected officials on environmental and  quality of life issues and a tool for     informing stakeholders of their role in preserving a higher quality of life and  cleaner environment in Montgomery County.</p>
<p><strong>What is the organization’s mission and vision?  </strong>Our mission is to sustain Montgomery County’s quality of life and natural resources for current and future generations. Conservation Montgomery’s vision is an environmentally literate citizenry and elected officials  who consider environmental impacts in decision -making.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=174#more-174" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=174</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>River Friendly Taipei</title>
		<link>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=173</link>
		<comments>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=173#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Green Roofs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This image from a Taiwanese art journal by artist Mali Wu envisions downtown Taipei covered with green roofs and green walls. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This image from a Taiwanese art journal by artist <a target="_blank" href="http://www.taipeibiennial.org/2008/TBArtists/ArtistContent.aspx?Language=iWtQXTY5yepbYP0ReEQvvxIHCRdaRaeW&amp;cid=iWtQXTY5yerWZqo3gg8/BMWc8ues1SIE">Mali Wu</a> envisions downtown Taipei covered with green roofs and green walls. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/GreenTaibei.jpg"><img width="493" src="http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/Images/GreenTaibei.jpg" height="672" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stormwaterpartners.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=173</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
